Transliteration:( Wa qaalal maliku'toonee bihee falammaa jaaa'ahur rasoolu qaalar-ji ilaa rabbika fas'alhu maa baalun niswatil laatee qatta'na aydiyahunn; inna Rabbee bikaidihinna 'Aleem )
109. This means when the steward came in the presence of the Pharoah and related this interpretation to him, he became aware of the calibre of knowledge of Hazrat Yusuf (on whom be peace), and he understood that a person of such lofty knowledge and wisdom will indeed be of strong character and excellent practices.Â
He should therefore place this entire administration and management in his hand, because he is not capable of executing it successfullyÂ
110. It means either the same steward or another personal messenger of the king the first assumption is stronger came to Hazrat Yusuf (on whom be peace) and conveyed the message of the king to him requesting him to leave the prison Hazrat Yusuf (on whom he peace) said this to him
111. This tells us that to absolve oneself of blame and to clarify any misunderstanding about oneself is the practise of the Prophets. Observe, Hazrat Yusuf (on whom be peace) did not leave the prison until such time that the false blame that was levelled against his purity and chastity was not cleared by him making those ladies to admit that they had falsely accused him.
Â
50. And the king said: “Bring him to me.” But when the messenger came to him, ﴿Yusuf﴾ said: “Return to your king and ask him, `What happened to the women who cut their hands Surely, my Lord (Allah) is Well-Aware of their plot.”’ 51. (The king) said (to the women): “What was your affair when you did seek to seduce Yusuf” The women said: “Allah forbid! No evil know we against him!” The wife of the `Aziz said: “Now the truth is manifest (to all); it was I who sought to seduce him, and he is surely of the truthful. ” 52. ﴿Then Yusuf said: “I asked for this inquiry﴾ in order that he may know that I betrayed him not in (his) absence.” And, verily, Allah guides not the plot of the betrayers. 53. “And I free not myself (from the blame). Verily, the self is inclined to evil, except when my Lord bestows His mercy (upon whom He wills). Verily, my Lord is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.”
Allah narrates to us that when the king was conveyed the interpretation of his dream, he liked Yusuf’s interpretation and felt sure that it was true. He realized the virtue of Prophet Yusuf, recognized his knowledge in the interpretation of dreams and valued his good conduct with his subjects in his country. The king said,
(Bring him to me.) `Release him from prison and bring him to me.’ When the king’s emissary came to Yusuf and conveyed the news of his imminent release, Yusuf refused to leave the prison until the king and his subjects declare his innocence and the integrity of his honor, denouncing the false accusation that the wife of the `Aziz made against him. He wanted them to know that sending him to prison was an act of injustice and aggression, not that he committed an offense that warranted it. He said,
(Return to your lord (i.e. king…) The Sunnah of our Prophet praised Prophet Yusuf and asserted his virtues, honor, elevated rank and patience, may Allah’s peace and blessings be on him. The Musnad and the Two Sahihs recorded that Abu Hurayrah said that the Messenger of Allah said,
(We are more liable to be in doubt than Ibrahim when he said,)
(My Lord! Show me how You give life to the dead. ..)
(And may Allah send His mercy on Lut! He wished to have powerful support! If I were to stay in prison for such a long time as Yusuf did, I would have accepted the offer.) In another narration collected by Ahmad from Abu Hurayrah, the Prophet said about Yusuf’s statement,
(“…and ask him, `What happened to the women who cut their hands Surely, my Lord (Allah) is Well-Aware of their plot.”’)
(If it was me, I would have accepted the offer rather than await my exoneration first.) Allah said (that the king asked),
(He said, “What was your affair when you did seek to seduce Yusuf”) The king gathered those women who cut their hands, while being hosted at the house of the wife of the `Aziz. He asked them all, even though he was directing his speech at the wife of his minister, the `Aziz in particular. He asked the women who cut their hands,
(What was your affair…), what was your story with regards to,
(when you did seek to seduce Yusuf) on the day of the banquet
(The women said: “Allah forbid! No evil know we against him!”) The women answered the king, `Allah forbid that Yusuf be guilty of this, for by Allah, we never knew him to do evil.’ This is when,
(The wife of the `Aziz said: “Now the truth has Hashasa…”) or the truth is manifest to all, according to Ibn `Abbas, Mujahid and others. Hashasa also means, `became clear and plain’,
(it was I who sought to seduce him, and he is surely of the truthful.) when he said,
(It was she that sought to seduce me.)
(in order that he may know that I betrayed him not in (his) absence. ) She said, `I admit this against myself so that my husband knows that I did not betray him in his absence and that adultery did not occur. I tried to seduce this young man and he refused, and I am admitting this so that he knows I am innocent,’
(And, verily, Allah guides not the plot of the betrayers. And I free not myself (from the blame).) She said, `I do not exonerate myself from blame, because the soul wishes and lusts, and this is what made me seduce him,’ for,
(Verily, the (human) self is inclined to evil, except when my Lord bestows His mercy (upon whom He wills).) whom Allah the Exalted wills to grant them immunity,
(Verily, my Lord is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.) This is the most viable and suitable understanding for the continuity of the story and the meanings of Arabic speech. Al-Mawardi mentioned this in his Tafsir, in support of it, it was also preferred by Imam Abu Al-`Abbas Ibn Taymiyyah who wrote about it in detail in a separate work. It was said Yusuf peace be upon him is the one who said,
(in order that he (the `Aziz) may know that I betrayed him not) with his wife,
(in (his) absence).) until the end of Ayah (53) He said, `I sent back the emissary, so that the king would investigate my innocence and the `Aziz be certain that,
(I betrayed him not), with his wife,
(in (his) absence. And, verily, Allah guides not the plot of the betrayers.)’ This is the only explanation presented by Ibn Jarir At-Tabari and Ibn Abi Hatim, but the first view is stronger and more obvious because it is a continuation of what the wife of the `Aziz said in the presence of the king. Yusuf was not present at all during this time, for he was released later on and brought to the king by his order.
(12:50) The king said: “Bring this man to me.” But when the royal messenger came to Joseph he said:[42] “Go back to your master and ask him about the case of the women who had cut their hands. Surely my Lord has full knowledge of their guile.”[43]
42. There is no mention in the Bible and the Talmud of this most important part of the story that Prophet Joseph declined to quit the prison till his character was cleared. On the other hand, according to the Bible: Then Pharaoh sent and called Joseph, and they brought him hastily out of the dungeon; and he shaved himself, and changed his raiment, and came in unto Pharaoh. And the Talmud depicts even a more degrading picture of the event. It says: The king ordered that Joseph should be brought before him. But he commanded his officers to be careful not to frighten the lad, lest through fear he should be unable to interpret correctly. And the servant of the king brought Joseph forth from his dungeon, and shaved him and clothed him in new garments, and carried him before the king. The king was seated upon his throne, and the glare and glitter of the jewels which ornamented the throne dazzled and astonished the eyes of Joseph. Now the throne of the king was reached by seven steps, and it was the custom of Egypt for a prince or noble who held audience with the king, to ascend to the sixth step; but when an inferior or a private citizen of the land was called into his presence, the king descended to the third step and from there spoke with him. (The Talmud, H. Polano, pp. 87-88).
A comparison of the degrading picture in the Talmud with this self respecting grand, and noble picture depicted in the Quran will convince every unbiased critic that the one in the Quran is worthy of a Prophet of God. Moreover the picture in the Talmud is open to a grave objection: Had Prophet Joseph behaved like a frightened and cringing lad who was so dazzled by the glitter and glare of the jewels of the throne that he bowed to the ground, how was it that the king and the courtiers were so impressed by him that they declared, “……the Hebrew has proved himself wise and skillful and through his wisdom shall our country be saved the pangs of want”? So much so that the king appointed him, without demur as governor over the land, second only to himself. All this shows that by that time he had proved his moral and mental superiority and had enhanced it by his refusal to quit the prison without proving his innocence. Otherwise, they would have never raised him to the highest rank in such a civilized and advanced country as Egypt.
43. He demanded an inquiry into the matter not because he himself had any doubt of his innocence, but because he was perfectly confident of this: My Lord has full knowledge of my innocence and of their cunning. But your lord should also make a thorough inquiry as to why I had been sent to prison, for I do not want to go before the public with any blemish or blot on my reputation. Therefore a public inquiry should be held to prove that I was an innocent victim of the injustice of the chiefs and nobles of the country, who had cast me into prison in order to cover up the guilt of their own ladies.
The words in which the demand was made clearly show that the king was already fully acquainted with the details of the incident that had happened at the banquet of the wife of Al-Aziz. That is why a mere reference to it was enough. Another noteworthy thing in this demand was that Prophet Joseph did not in any way hint at the part the wife of Al- Aziz had played in the event. This is another proof of his noble character that he did not like to involve and entangle the wife of his benefactor in the matter, even though she had done him her worst.
Related Ayat(Verses)/Topics